I just posted my review of Jennifer Senior’s, All Joy and No Fun, on Amazon. I titled it: Answers to Questions Are Not Reliable. Here’s the review:
I’m not recommending Jennifer Senior’s All Joy and No Fun because it’s based on answers to questions which, according to extensive research , are not reliable. Even Senior acknowledges (unintentionally, I presume) the unreliability of answers when she writes that some surveys generate contradictory results or, as she puts it with nicer words, “disparate trends” (p. 151), and that respondents are sometimes dishonest or, again, nicer, “more ambivalent . . . than we care to admit” (ibid). Similarly, Zoe Heller, in an overall favorable review of Senior’s amalgam of responses, writes: “of course” some respondents could be “lying or at least sentimentalizing the truth” . Respondents’ memory also can skew answers. Moreover, answers to questions are made unreliable, not only by respondents, but also by the other three components of the asking method: asking instruments, situations/environments in which questions are asked and answers given, and by askers themselves.
To be sure, not every answer to every question is incorrect; thus, some of the information in this book about the lives of parents could be accurate; but how can you distinguish between what’s accurate and what’s contradictory; between correct answers and the incorrect responses given by dishonest respondents? Well, you can’t! When all you have are answers—and that’s essentially all that Senior has—it’s impossible to know which, if any, are correct or incorrect. The only way to know is to check or verify answers with observation, documents, or from other non-asking sources of data. Senior does not check her answers with data from these other sources; all she has are answers, all she has is unreliable information. If you want to find out what’s really going on (concerning parents, or anything else) don’t ask!