Survey Researchers Justify Invalid, Inaccurate, Results

Survey researchers, and those who rely on survey research,  justify invalid, inaccurate, results.  For example, in a Chicago Tribune article it’s stated that a 2015 Compass Group report based on survey research “is not . . . valid”.  That does not stop the administrator of the administrator of the survey, Jean-Francois Gauthier, CFO of Compass Group, from justify these results: they’re “the best . . . we have”.  Other justifications for accepting invalid survey resource results include: the results are good “for this type of study” and the results are “food for thought”.  Survey researchers and those who rely on survey research accept, justify, and use any results they obtain.

For a further discussion of the justification of invalid, inaccurate, results by survey researchers and those who rely on survey research, see my book, The Problem with Survey Research, esp. pp. 267-72.

About georgebeam

George Beam is an educator and author. The perspectives that inform his interpretations of the topics of this blog–-as well as his other writings and university courses -–are system analysis, behaviorism, and Internet effects. Specific interests include quality management, methodology, and politics. He is Associate Professor Emeritus, Department of Public Administration; Affiliated Faculty, Department of Political Science; and, previously, Head, Department of Public Administration, University of Illinois at Chicago
This entry was posted in Survey Research and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s