Survey Researchers Recognize The Value of Data From Non-Asking Sources

Some survey researchers recognized the value of data from non-asking sources.  They are to be commended!  The only way to know if self-reports are correct or incorrect is to check or verify them with data from non-asking sources.  Newsletter No. 97, which I received from and university survey research unit, describes how biomeasures can be used to check or verify self-reports.  In bold are the parts of Newsletter No. 97 most relevant to this point.

“No. 97

Using Survey Data in Combination with Data from Other Sources: Incorporating Biomeasures with Survey Data

In this [Newsletter], we consider one particular type of data that might be collected
along with survey data: biomeasures. Although surveys predominantly rely
on data from self-reports, it is increasingly common to collect other sorts of
data as well. For example, particularly in health surveys, researchers may collect biomeasures.

Biomeasures are physical measures taken by the survey interviewer
or a researcher either at the time of the survey interview or (in some
cases) at a later time during a physical exam. Examples of biomeasures collected with surveys include direct measures such as height, weight, waist/hip circumference, blood pressure; simple physical performance tests (walking, balance, strength, cognition); or collection of specimens such as saliva, urine, or blood samples.

There are several reasons why researchers may incorporate biomeasures with
survey data: 1) to make population-representative inferences, if the survey
sample is randomly drawn, 2) to serve as a reference to self-reported
behaviors and health measures, 3) to better understand causal links between social /
environmental exposures and health, and 4) to explore the role of genetics.
Biomeasures may be particularly valuable when they provide data for variables that are difficult to assess via self-report, either because respondents may not be able to accurately answer survey questions on the topic (e.g., current blood pressure) or because the questions may be sensitive (e.g., illegal drug use). . . .”

For more information about sensitive questions, respondent cooperation/response rate, and other aspects of survey research, see The Problem with Survey Research.

See also my blog post, Counter Literature to Survey Research.

 

About georgebeam

George Beam is an educator and author. The perspectives that inform his interpretations of the topics of this blog–-as well as his other writings and university courses -–are system analysis, behaviorism, and Internet effects. Specific interests include quality management, methodology, and politics. He is Associate Professor Emeritus, Department of Public Administration; Affiliated Faculty, Department of Political Science; and, previously, Head, Department of Public Administration, University of Illinois at Chicago
This entry was posted in Survey Research and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s